******************************************************************************** The following section should be completed after the BARC has been field validated by the BAER team and this entire metadata file should be returned to GTAC with the Soil Burn Severity data. Fire name: PIPELINE BAER Assessment Completion Date:6/23/22 BAER Team GIS Analyst: Mark Christiano BAER Team Leader: Eric Schroder, Matthew O'Neill Soil Burn Severity Analyst(s): Robert Ballard, Kelly Mott-Lacroix, Kyle Paffett Original BARC256 thresholds: Unburned / Undetectable: <= 62 Low: > 62 and <= 116 Moderate: > 116 and <= 207 High: > 207 Soil Burn Severity thresholds Schultz fire reburn: Unburned / Undetectable: <= 62 Low: > 62 and <= 100 Moderate: > 100 and <= 194 High: > 195 Soil Burn Severity thresholds Pipeline fire newly burned area: Unburned / Undetectable: <= 62 Low: > 62 and <= 114 Moderate: > 114 and <= 185 High: > 185 Sequence of steps used to create Soil Burn Severity data: Due to site specific fire effects to soils in the Schultz fire burned area (2010), the BARC 256 image from the Pipeline fire was split into two images: A Schultz fire reburn image and a Pipeline fire newly burned area image. The moderate and high burn severity were extracted from the Schultz Fire SBS and used to create the Schultz Fire Burned Area. It was determined that the low and unburned portions of Schultz, with 12 years since the fire, would have no signifigant impact on how the Pipeline Fire burned. The Soil Burn Severity thresholds were adjusted for both images to reflect field observations collected on 6/21/22 and 6/22/22. Soil Burn Severity observations were stratified across all BARC severity levels in the burned area, including unburned observations outside the fire perimeter. The two datasets were then merged to create a single Soil Burn Severity image for the Pipeline fire. Additional Comments: Plot locations and photos avalaible upon request